US visa screening now targets applicants who fear persecution in home countries
State Department policy discourages asylum seekers from applying for temporary visas by questioning them about fears of returning home
WASHINGTON, United States (MNTV) – A new shift in U.S. visa screening policy is reshaping how applicants are evaluated at American embassies and consulates worldwide, introducing questions that directly probe fear of returning to one’s home country. According to internal guidance from the United States Department of State, visa applicants for temporary entry to the United States must now explicitly answer whether they have experienced harm in their country of origin and whether they fear returning. A positive response, or refusal to answer, significantly increases the likelihood of denial.
The directive instructs consular officers to treat these questions as a required step before interviews proceed. The stated goal is to strengthen screening and identify applicants who may misrepresent their intentions or conceal potential asylum claims during the visa process.
At the center of the change is a broader concern within the department: that existing procedures may not reliably detect individuals who later claim fear of persecution after entering the United States. The policy, however, immediately raises a structural tension. Under both U.S. law and the 1951 Refugee Convention, the right to seek asylum is not supposed to depend on how a person initially enters the country or what they told officials during a visa interview.
Critics argue the new screening approach effectively forces applicants into a high-risk disclosure. Those who genuinely fear persecution may be flagged or denied upfront, while those who deny fear to secure entry could later face accusations of misrepresentation, an offense that can trigger a permanent ban from the United States.
The policy builds on a broader enforcement framework tied to Donald Trump, including Executive Order 14161, which directed tighter vetting of foreign nationals on national security grounds. That order has already led to expanded country-specific entry restrictions and broader screening requirements. In parallel, earlier directives expanded social media and background screening for student and work visa applicants, particularly focusing on indicators of potential security risks.
The scale of the system is vast. In fiscal year 2024 alone, nearly 11 million non-immigrant visas were issued, covering tourists, students, skilled workers, and business travelers.
Supporters of the new questioning framework argue it strengthens national security by identifying risk earlier in the process. Opponents see a different consequence: a pre-screening system that may deter legitimate travelers, including victims of violence, political dissidents, and members of persecuted groups, from even attempting to apply.
A spokesperson for the State Department defended the policy, stating that visa officers are central to protecting national security and that all available tools are being used to assess eligibility under U.S. law.
What emerges is a system moving toward deeper psychological and political screening at the earliest stage of entry, where the question is no longer only who qualifies for a visa, but how fear itself is defined, recorded, and judged before a person ever sets foot on American soil.
We must take charge of our narrative. Research indicates that 92% of their Muslim coverage is negative. Help us change that.
Have Your Say!
Have you been affected by the issues raised in this story? Please share your experiences by emailing haveyoursay@soundvision.com.
Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a Muslim Network TV’s representative. You can also get in touch in the following ways:
Tweet: @MuslimNetworkTV
