El-Sayed calls for sweeping AI controls and stronger public oversight
Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed proposes strict limits on powerful AI systems, public oversight and protections against job losses and safety risks
DETROIT (MNTV) – Democratic US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed has unveiled an ambitious plan to rein in artificial intelligence, calling for limits on the development of powerful AI systems, stronger public oversight and safeguards against threats to jobs, public safety and humanity.
El-Sayed argues that AI is advancing faster than governments can regulate it, leaving decisions with enormous social consequences in the hands of a small group of technology billionaires.
His proposals include pausing the training and release of the most powerful systems until enforceable safety rules are established, banning recursive self-improvement and requiring emergency shutdown mechanisms for systems that pose serious risks.
The plan also calls for a cabinet-level AI safety agency and greater public accountability for leading companies.
El-Sayed has previously proposed placing half the equity of major AI firms in public hands and requiring frontier laboratories to operate as public benefit corporations.
His Republican opponent, former US Rep. Mike Rogers, has also called for slowing AI development and strengthening safeguards, but has yet to outline a comparable framework.
His position marks a shift from March, when he praised the Trump administration’s AI framework, which prioritised accelerating innovation, expanding deployment and streamlining permits for infrastructure such as data centres.
At the time, Rogers dismissed some fears about AI as “fearmongering.”
He has since advocated a moratorium on data-centre construction, saying local communities should decide whether such projects proceed.
The debate reflects broader concerns about AI’s impact on employment, electricity costs, environmental sustainability and public safety, as well as the concentration of technological power in private hands.
An Associated Press-NORC poll found that 64% of US adults believed AI was developing too quickly, while about eight in 10 said it was extremely or very important for the federal government to ensure AI remains under human control.
The competing proposals put AI regulation at the centre of the Michigan Senate race, raising questions about how policymakers should balance innovation with worker protections, democratic accountability and safeguards against potentially catastrophic risks.