UK media regulator targets Muslim TV channel amid campaign against Islamic media

LONDON (MNTV) – A growing sense of alarm is spreading among Muslim organizations and media professionals after Britain’s communications regulator confirmed that it is examining complaints against the country’s largest Muslim television network, the Islam Channel.

Many see the move as part of a broader campaign to delegitimize Muslim media and silence dissenting coverage on Palestine and global Muslim issues.

The British regulator said it is “assessing complaints” that allege the Islam Channel promoted extremist content and antisemitism. The complaint was filed by Oxford-based scholar Taj Hargey, who accused the network of bias and of providing a platform for “pro-Palestine narratives.”

Muslim leaders and analysts argue the allegations are politically motivated and reflect an increasing effort to criminalize faith-based journalism under the guise of “counter-extremism.”

“The Islam Channel has been one of the few voices challenging Western propaganda on Gaza and the wider Muslim world,” said Ahmed Versi, editor of The Muslim News.

“It’s not surprising that it is being targeted again. When you tell the truth about occupation and injustice, they call it extremism.”

Founded in 2004 by Tunisian-born broadcaster Mohamed Ali Harrath, the Islam Channel reaches more than two million viewers daily across the United Kingdom and Europe. It has established a reputation as a leading source of news, talk shows, and documentaries that focus on Muslim perspectives.

Over the years, however, it has repeatedly faced fines and investigations from Britain’s media watchdog. The regulator has previously sanctioned the network for programs that were deemed critical of Israel or that questioned Western policies in Muslim countries. Muslim media advocates say these sanctions reflect a double standard.

“When mainstream Western outlets spread lies about weapons of mass destruction or justify wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, they’re never investigated,” said Yvonne Ridley, a veteran British journalist who once presented on the channel.

“But when a Muslim broadcaster speaks out for justice or gives a platform to Palestinian voices, it’s accused of hate speech.”

The Islam Channel has denied wrongdoing in previous cases and maintained that its programs reflect legitimate religious and political debate. “We serve a diverse Muslim audience,” a former senior producer told MNTV.

“Our role is to give space to perspectives often ignored in British media, not to promote extremism.”

Latest complaint

The new controversy was triggered by a detailed complaint from Taj Hargey, director of the Oxford Institute for British Islam. His report accuses the channel of breaching Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code between November 2024 and January 2025.

Hargey alleges the channel praised Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attacks, compared Israel to Nazi Germany, and failed to present “balanced” views on the Gaza conflict.

Muslim advocacy groups say the complaint fits a familiar pattern.

“This is an old playbook — use one or two Muslim figures to attack Muslim institutions,” said Dr. Aisha Mahmood, director of the Muslim Media Forum in London. “The target is not just theIslam Channel but any platform that challenges the political status quo.”

Ofcom confirmed that it is “assessing the complaints but has not yet decided whether to launch a formal investigation.” The Islam Channel has not publicly commented on the matter, but insiders say it views the process as part of a continuing smear campaign.

The latest move against theIslam Channel comes amid what Muslim leaders describe as a coordinated campaign to marginalize Muslim voices across the West. In the United States, several Muslim charities and advocacy groups have faced funding restrictions and de-platforming. In France and Germany, Islamic organizations and mosques have been raided or shut down under “security” laws.

“This is not about extremism — it’s about erasing Muslim visibility,” said Mohammed Shafiq of the Ramadan Foundation. “Whether it’s Islam Channel in London or Muslim radio in Paris, they’re going after every space where Muslims speak for themselves.”

Many journalists see Ofcom’s timing as suspicious. The investigation comes during heightened tensions over Gaza, where British Muslim audiences have turned increasingly to community media for coverage.

“Mainstream broadcasters have failed to show the human cost of the war,” said Ridley. “People are looking to Muslim platforms for truth, and that’s what threatens the establishment.”

Experts say the targeting of the Islamic Channel is part of a wider Western pattern. In Canada, Muslim news portals have been accused of “foreign influence.” In Australia, Muslim radio stations have faced tighter monitoring. And in Europe, several Islamic cultural centers have been placed under financial scrutiny.

“The labeling of Muslim dissent as extremism is becoming institutionalized,” said Dr. Faisal Bukhari, a media scholar at the University of Westminster. “It’s about controlling the narrative on Islam and foreign policy.”

Bukhari noted that after the October 7 Hamas attack and Israel’s subsequent assault on Gaza, Muslim media worldwide faced unprecedented restrictions.

“Channels that aired footage of bombed hospitals were accused of spreading hate,” he said. “But Western outlets showing Israeli bombardments as self-defense faced no such scrutiny.”

The Islam Channel, which broadcasts in English, Urdu, and Arabic, has long positioned itself as an alternative to mainstream outlets like the BBC or Sky News. Its programs cover news, religion, and social issues affecting Muslims in Britain and abroad.

The network says it is “committed to ethical journalism” and has previously hosted interfaith panels, community debates, and charity telethons. “We reject all forms of hate,” its founder, Harrath, said in a past interview. “Our mission is to promote understanding and build bridges, not division.”

Harrath, who was once listed on an Interpol notice during Tunisia’s Ben Ali regime, says his inclusion was politically motivated. Interpol later removed him from its list. “They tried to criminalize me for advocating democracy and Islamic identity,” he told The Guardian in 2011. “Now they’re trying to criminalize Muslim media for doing the same.”

Test for press freedom

Muslim commentators warn that Ofcom’s handling of the case will send a powerful signal about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. “If faith-based journalism can be branded extremist, it endangers every minority voice in Britain,” said Zara Khan, a broadcast producer.

The National Union of Journalists has also raised concerns about overreach by regulators. “Media freedom must apply equally,” a union spokesperson said. “Plurality of perspectives, including faith-based ones, strengthens democracy.”

Community leaders have urged the government to resist framing Muslim media as a threat. “Our young people need representation, not repression,” said Imam Qari Asim, chair of the Mosques and Imams National Advisory Board. “If Muslim broadcasters are silenced, it feeds alienation and mistrust.”

As Ofcom weighs whether to proceed with a formal investigation, many Muslims see the controversy as a defining moment for representation and equality in British media.

“This is about who gets to tell the story,” said Ridley. “Either Muslims are allowed to speak for themselves, or others will continue to speak for them — and misrepresent them.”

For millions of British Muslims, the Islam Channel is more than a TV network. It is a platform for identity, dialogue, and visibility in a country where their voices are too often sidelined.

Whether the regulator’s inquiry becomes a fair review or another act in a larger campaign remains to be seen, but for now, the message from Muslim Britain is clear: “We will not be silenced.”